Higher Education Act

The Higher Education Act (HEA) is a federal law that governs the administration of federal higher education programs. Its purpose is to strengthen the educational resources of our colleges and universities and to provide financial assistance for students in postsecondary and higher education.

First passed in 1965 to ensure that every individual has access to higher education, regardless of income or zip code, the HEA governs student-aid programs, federal aid to colleges, and oversight of teacher preparation programs. It is generally scheduled for reauthorization by Congress every five years to encourage growth and change.

The HEA has been reauthorized in 1968, 1972, 1976, 1980, 1986, 1992, 1998, and 2008. Current authorization for the programs in the Higher Education Act expired at the end of 2013, but has been extended while Congress prepares changes and amendments.
Capitol

Latest Actions

Efforts to update the Higher Education Act stalled as the COVID-19 pandemic put Congressional discussions on hold. Prior to the outbreak, lawmakers were reportedly close to reaching a deal after years of failure. However, there is hope that negotiations will eventually resume in the 117th Congress.

HEA in the 116th Congress

  • Senate Action

    U.S. Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee Chairman Lamar Alexander (R-TN) in September 2019 introduced a piecemeal approach to update the Higher Education Act in the 116th Congress (2019-2020). The Student Aid Improvement Act, S. 2557, included eight bipartisan bills to streamline the Federal Application for Student Aid (FAFSA), simplify financial aid award letters, expand Pell Grant eligibility for students in prisons and allow Pell to be used for short-term programs, among other changes. The proposal followed months of stalled efforts to reach a bipartisan deal for a comprehensive HEA reauthorization.

    SENATE PRESS RELEASE   BILL TEXT

  • House Action

    Democrats on the U.S. House Education and Labor Committee in October 2019 unveiled a sweeping overhaul of the federal higher education law, aiming to cut the cost of college and increase access to college for low-income and minority students. The College Affordability Act included provisions that would:

    • Include the Reverse Transfer Efficiency Act, which AACRAO strongly supports and has advocated for over the past several years
    • Create a national tuition-free community college through a federal-state partnership model where the federal government contributes a per student amount at least 75 percent of the average resident tuition for public community colleges and states contribute 25 percent
    • Increase the maximum Pell Grant award by $500 and permanently index the award to inflation
    • Simplify FAFSA, including an automatic zero EFC for recipients of means-tested benefits
    • Create the Federal Direct Perkins Loan Program to provide an additional source of borrowing for undergraduates and graduates
    • Allow Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) and certain other undocumented students access to federal student aid
    • Repeal the federal "student unit record" ban and require the Education Department to develop a system that uses student-level data to evaluate postsecondary outcomes
    • Change the 90/10 rule ratio (the percentage cap of Title IV aid an institution may receive) to 85/15 and expand it to include all educational programs
    • Require the Education Department to establish a Borrower Defense to Repayment process to discharge the federal loans of students who were defrauded by their colleges
    • Require the Education Department to establish a compliance standard that includes a debt-to-earnings threshold for training programs that are statutorily required to lead to gainful employment
    • Prohibit the Education Department from issuing or enforcing the proposed Title IX rules that the Trump administration published in November 2018, among other things.
     

    The College Affordability Act shared some key provisions with the Senate's package of bipartisan bills. Both proposals aimed to streamline FAFSA, simplify financial aid award letters, and expand Pell eligibility for incarcerated students and short-term programs—although the House bill excluded for-profit colleges.

    However, the House measure did not gain any traction in the 116th Congress's Republican-controlled Senate.

    HOUSE PRESS RELEASE BILL TEXT OVERVIEW OF COLLEGE AFFORDABILITY ACT

     

UPDATES

House Hearing on Lowering College Costs, Increasing Value

Aug 3, 2023, 09:01 AM
legacy id :
Summary : Panel discussed the need for innovation and better data in higher education to improve accountability and student outcomes.
Url :

The U.S. House Subcommittee on Higher Education and Workforce Development held a hearing last week to discuss the need for innovation and better data in higher education to improve accountability and student outcomes, Inside Higher Ed reported. 

During the hearing, Republican lawmakers criticized the growth of non-teaching staff positions on campuses, rising tuition costs, and the general state of American higher education. Democrats emphasized the importance of holding bad actors accountable, particularly for-profit institutions, and expressed concern about the Republicans' vision for higher education.

The discussion revolved around reauthorizing the Higher Education Act, touching on ideas to expand the Pell Grant to short-term programs, implement accountability metrics for all institutions, rethink accreditation, and reform the student loan system. The panel also discussed the concept of risk sharing, where colleges and universities would co-sign student loans, making them responsible if students cannot pay.

The panel touched on the imperfect information available to students when choosing higher education programs, which makes the market for higher education different from other markets. Democrats supported the Biden administration's proposed gainful employment rule to provide more information to students about program quality, but there were differing opinions on creating a list of programs with low financial value.

The hearing also covered transparency about college costs and the impact of declining state support on rising tuition were also discussed. Lawmakers considered the connection between quality and price and explored ways institutions can change for the better to benefit students and taxpayers. Some raised concerns about limiting student borrowing based on future earnings and its potential impact on liberal arts education, Inside Higher Ed reported.

Related Links

The U.S. House Subcommittee on Higher Education and Workforce Development Hearing

https://edworkforce.house.gov/calendar/eventsingle.aspx?EventID=409427 


Inside Higher Ed

https://www.insidehighered.com/news/government/2023/07/28/house-subcommittee-explores-how-lower-cost-college 


Michelle Mott
Categories :
  • Accreditation
  • Advocacy
  • Financial Aid and FAFSA
  • Higher Education Act
Tags :
  • accountability
  • college-cost
  • Cost of Attendance
  • Federal Regulations
  • Federal relations
  • for-profit colleges
  • gainful employment
  • learning outcomes
  • pell grant
  • student loans
  • Student Success
  • tuition
Related people