Affirmative Action Challenge and Supreme Court Guidance

Supreme Court Cases: Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) v. Harvard and UNC

America’s higher education institutions have long recognized and cultivated the educational benefits of diversity. AACRAO believes holistic admissions practices are instrumental in helping institutions to identify students who are likely to thrive in their educational programs.

We will continue our efforts in support of equitable access to education. Our meetings, workshops, and digital platforms will continue to have space for institutions to work towards confronting implicit bias and addressing systemic inequities. We will provide support to institutions as they reframe their admissions plans in light of this legislation, while ensuring that the successes of minoritized students are not set back. And we will work to ensure that data-informed processes are built to develop and improve student support and programming. 

Read our statement on the rulings to learn more. 

Webinars

The Supreme Court Speaks: Understanding the Implications of Race-Conscious Admission Decision

3:00-4:30 PM ET | JULY 19, 2023

AACRAO, NACAC, NASFAA have joined together to present a webinar on the SFFA v Harvard and UNC cases. This webinar will provide attendees with a streamlined, practical analysis of two recent U.S. Supreme Court cases challenging race-conscious admission policies: Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) v. Harvard and SFFA v. UNC.

Register Now

Looking Back, Planning Ahead

On February 2, 2023, AACRAO hosted a webinar that examines the pending U.S. Supreme cases where the central question is whether colleges and universities can continue to consider an applicant’s race and ethnicity as part of the holistic review process in admissions.

View Recording

AACRAO Process Examination Guidelines

AACRAO encourages members to begin to examine any admissions or recruitment practices that target populations of a specific race as well as their overall holistic/equity admissions practices.

To assist in this process, AACRAO is providing this guidance document to prepare our members for a possible major change in their ability to consider an applicant’s race and ethnicity as part of a holistic/equity review in admissions. 

REVIEW GUIDANCE

Updates

Biden Official Clarifies Scope of SCOTUS Admissions Decision

Aug 30, 2023, 17:17 PM
legacy id :
Summary : The ruling provides an "opportunity—welcome or not—to reconsider what and how to do the work to admit, retain, support and graduate diverse classes."
Url :

Catherine Lhamon, assistant secretary in the U.S. Education Department's Office for Civil Rights, spoke at an event on Tuesday hosted by The Center for American Progress. Her message was clear: despite the Supreme Cour's decision to strike down race-conscious admissions practices, American higher education institutions can still recruit and retain diverse student bodies, reported Inside Higher Ed.

"There are a lot of ways to admit, support and graduate students that are separate and apart from the admissions practice that was in front of the court," said Lhamon, "we have not been told that it's unlawful to engage in other practices."

For example, colleges and universities can still take into account how an applicant's race may have affected their individual experience. Additionally, the Supreme Court's decision also allows institutions to collect student demographic data, but information related to an applicant's race cannot influence admissions decisions. The options that remain available to colleges "offer up a very wide-open field for the coalition of the willing," Lhamon said, "and I hope that coalition is wide." 

Despite encouragement from figures like Lhamon, there still remains a great deal of confusion and subsequent hesitancy over what exactly the Supreme Court's decision means, reported Inside Higher Ed. For instance, immediately following the decision, the Missouri attorney general instructed state universities to drop scholarships for minority students. However, the Office of Civil Rights has made it clear that the court's ruling does not apply to financial aid or scholarships. Similarly, some conservative legal activists have argued that the decision bans school-sponsored student groups or programs that focus on race. In response, the Office of Civil Rights released guidance that these groups do not violate federal law as long as they are open to all students. Lhamon commented the following:

"There's so much public conversation now about whether [diversity, equity and inclusion] activities are lawful and whether they're even good policy goals," Lhamon stated. "I really want school communities to hear from me an emphatic yes. Federal law does not categorically bar those kinds of activities, and there are circumstances under which it's actually required."

Related Links

Inside Higher Ed

https://www.insidehighered.com/news/government/2023/08/30/lhamon-clarifies-scope-supreme-courts-affirmative-action-ruling 

U.S. Department of Education Press Release

https://www.ed.gov/news/press-releases/advance-diversity-and-opportunity-higher-education-justice-and-education-departments-release-resources-advance-diversity-and-opportunity-higher-education 


Michael Bilfinger
Categories :
  • Admissions and Recruitment
  • Advocacy
  • Diversity and Inclusion
  • Financial Aid and FAFSA
  • Holistic Admissions
Tags :
  • Affirmative Action
  • Affirmative Action Challenge
  • diversity equity and inclusion
  • Federal relations
  • in the courts
  • Race
  • race-conscious
  • supreme court
Related people