Welcome to the new AACRAO website. While the site is live, development is ongoing, visitors can expect updates and new features in the weeks ahead.

Mobile Nav
Log in
Join
Get Involved

You must be logged in to view this content. Please login or learn more about joining AACRAO. If you have any questions or experience any issues logging in, please reach out to us atmembership@aacrao.org.

Log In Join

Topics

,

Article Type

Professional Proficiency

Article Abstract

Related Issue:

University campuses continue to see an increase in the number of helicopter parents, those parents who are hovering about the campus, ready to swoop down and rescue their children at the first sign of distress (Cartmell and McCullough 2014). Retention personnel on campus questioned whether it would be possible to develop initiatives that would intentionally guide parents in ways that help increase freshman retention rates. Research has been done and shown that students’ parents can serve as a safety net for their freshmen, increasing the students’ willingness to take on greater academic and social challenges (Kalsner and Pistole 2003). The difficulty for college campuses is how to capitalize on the untapped resource and determine whether it aids in greater retention and success of freshman students. Attachment theory is the basis for an innovative retention initiative that was developed at The University of Tennessee at Martin, which seeks to provide a landing pad for helicopter parents who want to be involved during their students’ first year. Incoming freshman parents are encouraged to take advantage of an online parent portal that contains academic resources and information about their child’s college performance. The information provided on the portal is intended to help parents begin conversations with their students about how to succeed in the college arena. To measure the effectiveness of the initiative, a sample of 300 first-time, full-time freshmen from the fall 2012 entering freshman class was analyzed. Data were evaluated looking for student retention differences, as well as differences in the end-of-first-year grade point averages. Correlations were found between parent involvement and freshman retention, as well as grade point averages. Interestingly, the research also showed that there appears to be a point of diminishing returns associated to the amount of parental involvement.

Author(s)

Brandy Mallory Cartmell, interim executive director of Enrollment Services & Student Engagement and Registrar, has worked for The University of Tennessee at Martin since 1996. Currently she oversees the Office of Enrollment Services & Student Engagement, which is the umbrella for the Office of Academic Records, Admissions, Financial Aid and Scholarships, Career Services, First Year Programs, and the Student Success Center. Brandy holds an M.B.A. from UT Martin and a doctorate degree from The University of Tennessee Chattanooga in Learning and Leadership with a focus in technology.

References

Agliata, A., and K. Renk. 2008. College students’ adjustment: Therole of parent–college student expectation discrepancies and communication reciprocity. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 37(8): 967–982.

Ainsworth, M. D. S., and J. Bowlby. 1991. An ethological approach to personality development. American Psychologist. 46(4): 333–341.

Armsden, G. C., and M. T. Greenberg. 1987. The inventory of parent and peer attachment: Individual differences and their relationship to psychological well-being in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 16(5): 427–454.

Bean, J. P. 2003. College student retention. In Encyclopedia of Education, 2nd ed., Vol. 1: 401–407. New York: Macmillan References USA.

Bell, K. L. 1998. Family expressiveness and attachment. Social Development. 7(1): 37–53.

Black, J. E. 2001. Strategic Enrollment Management Revolution. Washington, D.C.: AACRAO.

Bowlby, J. 1973. Attachment and Loss, Vol. 2: Separation. New York: Basic Books.

Braxton, J. M., A .S. Hirschy, and S. A. McClendon. 2004. Understanding and reducing college student departure. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report. 30(3). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Bryan, E., and L.A. Simmons. 2009. Family involvement: Impacts on post-secondary educational success for first-generation Appalachian College students. Journal of College Student Development. 50(4): 391–406.

Cabrera, A. F., M. B. Castañeda, A. Nora, and D. Hengstler. 1992. The convergence between two theories of college persistence. The Journal of Higher Education. 63(2): 143–164.

Carney-Hall, K. C. 2008. Understanding current trends in family involvement. In Managing Parent Partnerships: Maximizing Influence, Minimizing Interference, and Focusing on Student Success, New Directions for Student Services, No. 122, edited by K. C. Carney-Hall. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Cartmell, B. 2014. The Relationship between Freshman Student Retention and Use of an Online Parent Portal. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Learning and Leadership, The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, Chattanooga, Tennessee.

Cartmell, B., and D. McCullough. 2014. Helicopter Parents and Freshman Retention. Paper presented at the 10th Annual National Symposium on Student Retention, Louisville, KY.

Chickering, A. W., and L. Reisser. 1993. Education and Identity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Cotten, S. R. 2008. Students’ technology use and the impacts on well-being. In Using Emerging Technologies to Enhance Student Engagement, New Directions for Student Services, No. 124, edited by R. Junco and D.M. Timm. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Cutrona, C. E., V. Cole, and N. Colangelo, S. G. Assouline, and D. W. Russell. 1994. Perceived parental social support and academic achievement: An attachment theory perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 66(2): 369–378.

Daniel, B. V., S. G. Evans, and B. R. Scott. 2001. Understanding family involvement in the college experience today. In Consumers, Adversaries, and Partners: Working with the Families of Undergraduates, New Directions for Student Services, no. 94, edited by B. V. Daniel and B. R. Scott). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Duffy, J. O. 2007. Invisibly at Risk: Low-Income Students in a Middle and Upper-Class World. College of Professional Studies Faculty Publications, Paper 3. Boston, MA: Northeastern University.

Dworkin, J., C. Gonzalez, C. Gengler, and K. Olson. 2011. Using newsletters to improve parents’ communication with their early adolescents. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences. 103(1): 47–54.

Evans, N. J., D. S. Forney, and F. Guido-DiBrito. 1998. Student Development in College: Theory, Research, and Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Ferrara, M. M. 2011. Phrase versus phase: Family engagement. The Clearing House. 84:180–183.

Florez-Lopez, R., and J. M. Ramon-Jeronimo. 2009. Marketing segmentation through machine learning models: An approach based on customer relationship management and customer profitability accounting. Social Science Computer Review. 27(1): 96–117.

Gerdes, E. P. 2004. Valuing parents. Change. 36(5): 60–61.

Grayson, K. 2010. Managing the student for life. Campus Technology. January 27.

Grotevant, H. D., and C. R. Cooper. 1998. Individuality and Connectedness in Adolescent Development: Review and Prospects for a Research on Identity, Relationships, and Context. New York: Routledge.

Habley, W. R., J. L. Bloom, and S. Robbins. 2012. Increasing Persistence. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Harvard Family Research Project. 2007. Family Involvement in Middle and High School Students’ Education. Boston: TSNE Mission Works.

Hoover, E. 2008. Surveys of students challenge ‘helicopter parent’ stereotypes. The Chronicle of Higher Education. February 1.

Howe, N., and W. Strauss. 2007. Millennials Go to College. Great Falls, VA: LifeCourse Associates.

Josselson, R. 1988. The embedded self: I and thou revisited. In Self, Ego, and Identity, edited by D. K. Lapsley and F. C. Power. New York: Spring-Verlag.

Junco, R., and J. Mastrodicasa. 2007. Connecting to the Net Generation. Washington, D.C.: National Association of Student Personnel Administrators.

Kahlenberg, R. D. 2004. America’s Untapped Resource: Low-Income Students in Higher Education. New York: The Century Foundation Press.

Kalsner, L., and M. C. Pistole. 2003. College adjustment in a multiethnic sample: Attachment, separation-individuation, and ethnic identity. Journal of College Student Development. 44(1): 92–109.

Kanat-Maymon, M., and A. Assor. 2010. Perceived maternal control and responsiveness to distress as predictors of young adults’ empathic responses. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 36(1): 33–46.

Kenny, M. E. 1994. Quality and correlates of parental attachment among late adolescents. Journal of Counseling and Development. 72: 399–403.

Kilgore, A. J. 2010. Teachers’ Perspectives on Using E-mail to Communicate with Parents. Doctoral study submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Education, Walden University. Ann Arbor, MI: ProQuest LLC.

Kuh, G. D., J. Kinzie, J. H. Schuh, and E. J. Whitt. 2005. Student Success in College: Creating Conditions that Matter. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

LaBrie, J. W., J. F. Hummer, A. Lac, P. J. Ehret, and S. R. Kenney. 2011. Parents know best, but are they accurate? Parental normative misperceptions and their relationship to students’ alcohol-related outcomes. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs. 72(4): 521–529.

Lapsley, D. K., and J. Edgerton. 2002. Separation-individuation, adult attachment style, and college adjustment. Journal of Counseling & Development 80: 484–492.

Larose, S., and M. Boivin. 1998. Attachment to parents, social support expectations, and socioemotional adjustment during the high school-college transition. Journal of Research on Adolescence. 8(1): 1–27.

Lipka, S. 2007. Helicopter parents help students, survey finds. The Chronicle of Higher Education. 54(11).

Lum, L. 2006. Handling ‘helicopter parents.’ Diverse Issues in Higher Education. 23(20): 40–42.

Marcus, J. 2010. Forever young: Students tied to the electronic apron strings. Times Higher Education. June 24.

Martin, H. E. 2009. Book review—Managing parent partnerships: Maximizing influence, minimizing interference, and focusing on student success. NACADA Journal. 1(29).

Mattanah, J., B. Brand, and G. Hancock. 2004. Parental attachment, separation-individuation, and college student adjustment: A structural equation analysis of mediational effects. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 51(2): 213–225.

McKeown-Moak, M. P. 2013. The ‘new’ performance funding in higher education. Educational Considerations. 40(2): 3–13.

Merriman, L. S. 2008. Managing parent involvement during a crisis. In Managing Parent Partnerships: Maximizing Influence, Minimizing Interference, and Focusing on Student Success, New Directions for Student Services, No. 122, edited by K. C. Carney-Hall. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Miao, K. 2012. Performance-Based Funding of Higher Education: A Detailed Look at Best Practices in 6 States. Washington, D.C.: Center for American Progress.

Musico, C. 2008. Making CRM mandatory for university administration: Why higher-education spending on CRM is set to almost double by 2012. CRM Magazine. August 1.

National Center for Education Statistics. 2010. Table 12. Educational Attainment of Persons 25 Years Old and Over, by Race/Ethnicity and State: 2006-08. Digest of Education Statistics: 2010. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.

National Survey of Student Engagement. 2007. Experiences that Matter: Enhancing Student Learning and Success. Bloomington: The Trustees of Indiana University.

NCES. See National Center for Education Statistics.

NSSE. See National Survey of Student Engagement.

Page, G. A., and M. Hill. 2008. Information, communication, and educational technologies in rural Alaska. In Adult Education in the Rural Context: People, Place, and Change, New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, No. 117, edited by J. A. Ritchey. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Pascarella, E. T., and P. T. Terenzini. 2005. How College Affects Students: A Third Decade of Research, Vol. 2. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Pryor, J. H., S. Hurtado, J. Korn, and J. Sharkness. 2007. The American Freshman: National Norms for Fall 2007. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles.

Ramaswami, R. 2007. Think ‘360.’ Campus Technology. March 1.

Salas, G., and J. S. Alexander. 2008. Technology for institutional enrollment, communication, and student success. In Using Emerging Technologies to Enhance Student Engagement, New Directions for Student Services, No. 124, edited by R. Junco and D. M. Timm. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Sammis, J., and H. Bailey. 2010. Getting the full picture. Currents. 36(2): 28–33.

Schultheiss, D. E. P., and D. L. Blustein. 1994. Role of adolescent-parent relationships in college student development and adjustment. Journal of Counselling Psychology. 41(2): 248–255.

Schwartz, J., and W. Buboltz. 2004. The relationship between attachment to parents and psychological separation in college students. Journal of College Student Development. 45(5): 566–577.

Scott, B. R., and B. V. Daniel. 2001. Why parents of undergraduates matter to higher education. In Consumers, Adversaries, and Partners: Working with the Families of Undergraduates, New Directions for Student Services, No. 94, edited by B. V. Daniel and B. R. Scott. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Seeman, E. D., and M. O’Hara. 2006. Customer relationship management in higher education: Using information systems to improve the student-school relationship. Campus-Wide Information Systems. 23(1): 24–34.

Shellenbarger, S. 2005. Tucking the kids in—In the dorm: Colleges ward off overinvolved parents. The Wall Street Journal. July 28.

Somers, P., and J. Settle. 2010. The helicopter parent. College and University. 86(2): 2–9.

Sorokou, C., and C. Weissbrod. 2005. Men and women’s attachment and contact patterns with parents during the first year of college. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 34(3): 221–228.

Taub, D. J. 2008. Exploring the impact of parental involvement on student development. In Managing Parent Partnerships: Maximizing Influence, Minimizing Interference, and Focusing on Student Success, New Directions for Student Services, No. 122, edited by K. C. Carney-Hall. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Tennessee Higher Education Commission. 2010. 2010 Outcomes Based Funding Formula Model Presentation. Fiscal Affairs.

Tennessee Higher Education Commission. 2011. The Complete College Tennessee Act Summary.

Tennessee Higher Education Commission. 2012. 2010 Outcomes Based Funding Formula Model Presentation. Tennessee Higher Education Commission: 2010 Formula Review Committee.

THEC. See Tennessee Higher Education Commission.

Thomson, R. 2009. Towards a digital future. Adults Learning. 21(1): 8–11.

Tinto, V. 1993. Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition, 2nd ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Tinto, V. 1999. Taking retention seriously: Rethinking the first year of college. NACADA Journal. 19(2): 1–8.

Trice, A. D. 2002. First semester college students’ email to parents: Frequency and content related to parenting style. College Student Journal. 36(3): 327–334.

University of Tennessee Martin. 2012. Fact Book 2012. Martin, TN: Author.

UTM. See University of Tennessee Martin.

van Roekel, E., L. Goossens, R. H. J. Scholte, R. C. M. E. Engels, and M. Verhagen. 2011. The dopamine D2 receptor gene, perceived parental support, and adolescent loneliness: Longitudinal evidence for gene-environment interactions. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 52(10): 1044–1051.

Villano, M. 2007. Student lifecycle management: CRM meets the campus. Campus Technology. February 1.

Ward, L., M. J. Siegel, and Z. Davenport. 2012. First-Generation College Students: Understanding and Improving the Experience from Recruiting to Commencement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Ward-Roof, J. A., P. M. Heaton, and M. B. Coburn. 2008. Capitalizing on Parent and Family Partnerships through Programming. In Managing Parent Partnerships: Maximizing Influence, Minimizing Interference, And Focusing On Student Success, New Directions for Student Services, No. 122, edited by K. C. Carney-Hall. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Wartman, K. L., and M. B. Savage. 2008. Parental Involvement in Higher Education: Understanding the Relationship among Students, Parents, and the Institution. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Weinberger, J. 2004. Customers for life: How to transform loyalty into commitment into revenue. CRM Magazine. 8(7): 32–38.

Wetherill, R. R., D. J. Neal, and K. Fromme. 2010. Parents, peers, and sexual values influence sexual behavior during the transition to college. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 39(3): 682–694.

White, W. S. 2005. Students, parents, colleges: Drawing the lines. The Chronicle of Higher Education. December 16: B16, D16.

Wintre, M. G., B. Dilouya, S. M. Pancer, M. W. Pratt, S. Birnie-Lefcovitch, J. Polivy, and G. Adams. 2011. Academic achievement in first-year university: Who maintains their high school average?” Higher Education. 62(4): 467–481.

Wintre, M. G., and M. Yaffe. 2000. First-year students’ adjustment to university life as a function of relationships with parents. Journal of Adolescent Research. 15(9): 9–37.

Wolf, D. S., L. J. Sax, and C. E. Harper. 2009. Parental Engagement and Contact in the Academic Lives of College Students. NASPA Journal. 46(2): 325–358.

Related Posts

See all Posts