Welcome to the new AACRAO website. While the site is live, development is ongoing, visitors can expect updates and new features in the weeks ahead.

You must be logged in to view this content. Please login or learn more about joining AACRAO. If you have any questions or experience any issues logging in, please reach out to us atmembership@aacrao.org.

Log In Join

It is self-evident (and well supported in the literature) that the culture of an organization is an important aspect of how successful an organization is at meeting its goals. What is less evident is what the elements of the culture of an organization are; how can they be quantified; and how can we adjust them in a manner that will impact its effectiveness. This article examines an organizational culture diagnosis initiative that utilized the Competing Values Framework model in a fast-growing strategic enrollment management (SEM) division. The division was accumulating new student success-related departments at a pace that the leadership felt might affect the culture of the organization. The purpose of the initiative was to quantify the staff perception of the current state of the divisional organizational culture; quantify the staff perception of the preferred future state of the organizational culture; and recommend the creation of a metrics-driven plan to actively move the culture to the preferred state. This work seems to be unique in the SEM arena because of the quantitative approach taken to discern the state of the culture.

Michael S. Flanigan is Director of Planning and Operational Technologies in the Division of Strategic Enrollment Management at Virginia Commonwealth University. Flanigan’s SEM leadership experience includes information technology, admissions, registrar, financial aid, ERP implementation, and one-stop student services center development. In addition to leading organizational change, technical and business-area initiatives in higher education, his background includes private industry leadership experience in information technology as a director and project manager. Mike is currently enrolled in the Doctor of Education in Leadership program at VCU, where his research interests include organizational change, leadership, and educational technology.

Bontrager, B. 2008. SEM and Institutional Success: Integrating Enrollment, Finance, and Student Access. Washington, D.C.: American Association of Collegiate Registrars and Admissions Officers.

Belasen, A., and Frank, N. 2008. Competing values leadership: Quadrant roles and personality traits. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. 29(2): 127–143.

Berrio, A.A. 2003. An organizational culture assessment using the competing values framework: A profile of Ohio State University Extension. Journal of Extension. 41(2).

Bolman, L.G., and Deal, T.E. 2008. Reframing Organizations: Artistry, Choice, and Leadership (4th ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Cameron, K.S., and Quinn, R.E. 2011a. Diagnosing and Changing Organizational Culture: Based on the Competing Values Format (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Cameron, K.S., and Quinn, R.E. 2011b. The Competing Values Culture Assessment. A Tool from the Competing Values Product Line. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Board of Regents.

Cormier, J. 2008. Multi-frame leadership, goal orientation their relationship to organizational effectiveness in intercollegiate athletics (master’s thesis). Richmond, VA: Virginia Commonwealth University.

Dale, K.K. 2012. Perceptions of organizational culture of a multi-campus community college district: Mixed methods in concert (doctoral dissertation). Fort Collins, CO: Colorado State University.

Giberson, T., Resick, C., Dickson, M., Mitchelson, J., Randall, K., and Clark, M. 2009. Leadership and organizational culture: Linking CEO characteristics to cultural values. Journal of Business and Psychology. 24(2): 123–137.

Hartnell, C.A., Ou, A.Y., and Kinicki, A. 2011. Organizational culture and organizational effectiveness: A meta-analytic investigation of the competing values framework’s theoretical suppositions. Journal of Applied Psychology. 96(4): 677–694.

Hossler, D., Kalsbeek, D.H., and Bontrager, B. 2015. Successful strategic enrollment management organizations. In Handbook of Strategic Enrollment Management, edited by D. Hossler, B. Bontrager. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Jung, T., Scott, T., Davies, H.T. O., Bower, P., Whalley, D., McNally, R., and Mannion, R. 2009. Instruments for exploring organizational culture: A review of the literature. Public Administration Review. 69(6): 1087–1096.

Kalsbeek, D.H. 2006. Some reflections on SEM structures and strategies: Part one. College and University. 81(3): 3.

Kwan, P., and Walker, A. 2004. Validating the competing values model as a representation of organizational culture through inter-institutional comparisons. Organizational Analysis. 12(1): 21–37.

Krejcie, R., and Morgan, D. 1970. Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 30: 607–610.

Schein, E.H. 2010. Organizational Culture and Leadership (4th ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Schultheis, L.D. 2014. Creating a culture of inclusive excellence in strategic enrollment management through distributed leadership. Strategic Enrollment Management Quarterly. 2(1): 12–21.

Selden, S.J. 2014. The relationships between perceptions of organizational culture and organizational commitment among college and university counselors and advisors who provide educational support to at-risk students (doctoral dissertation). State College, PA: The Pennsylvania State University.

Shiflett, K. 2015. The relationship between organizational culture and adherence to regulatory requirements for online programs (doctoral dissertation). University of Pittsburgh.

Smart, J.C. 2003. Organizational effectiveness of 2-year colleges: The centrality of cultural and leadership complexity. Research in Higher Education. 44(6): 673–703.

Smart, J.C., and St. John, E.P. 1996. Organizational culture and effectiveness in higher education: A test of the “culture type” and “strong culture” hypotheses. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 18(3): 219–241.

Related Posts