The U.S. Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee on Wednesday held a hearing on higher education accountability.
HELP Committee Chairman Lamar Alexander (R-TN) and Ranking Member Patty Murray (D-WA) aim to strengthen the methods and means the federal government utilizes to hold colleges and universities accountable for the federal aid they receive as part of the panel’s efforts to reauthorize the Higher Education Act (HEA). However, both lawmakers hold differing opinions on key policy proposals to accomplish that goal.
Tressie McMillan Cottom, Assistant Professor Of Sociology at Virginia Commonwealth; Adam Looney, Joseph A. Pechman Director Of The Center On Regulation And Markets at the Brookings Institute; David Tandberg, Vice President For Policy Research And Strategic Initiatives at the State Higher Education Executive Officers Association (SHEEO); and Belle Wheelan, President of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges testified at the hearing.
Meanwhile, the House Subcommittee on Higher Education and Workforce Investment also held a hearing last week on the subject of accountability, as the chamber works on its own comprehensive update of the HEA. The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) submitted testimony to the panel identifying opportunities to strengthen federal higher education accountability in three areas: educational quality, financial stability, and federal student loan defaults.
The GAO found that schools with weaker student outcomes were, on average, no more likely to be sanctioned by accreditors than schools with stronger student outcomes, and the Education Department does not make consistent use of sanction data that could help it identify insufficient accreditor oversight. It recommended that the department use accreditor data in its recognition review process to determine whether accreditors are consistently applying and enforcing their standards to ensure schools provide a quality education.
The office also recommended the department update the financial composite score it uses to measure the financial health—and potential risk of closure—of schools participating in federal student aid programs. The score, which has not been updated since it was first established more than 20 years ago, has, as a result, become an imprecise risk measure, as it does not reflect changes in accounting practices and standards, relies on outdated financial measures, and is vulnerable to manipulation.
Additionally, the GAO suggested that Congress consider statutory changes to strengthen schools’ accountability for student loan defaults. The office previously found that some institutions managed these default rates by hiring consultants that encouraged borrowers with past-due payments to put their loans in forbearance, an option that allows borrowers to temporarily postpone payments and bring past due loans current. Although Education Department officials and student loan experts said forbearance is intended to be a short-term option, GAO’s analysis of federal data found that 20 percent of borrowers who began repaying their loans in 2013 had loans in forbearance for 18 months or more. These borrowers defaulted more often in the fourth year of repayment, when schools are not accountable for defaults, suggesting long term forbearance may have delayed—not prevented—default.
Related Links
U.S. Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee Hearing
https://www.help.senate.gov/hearings/reauthorizing-the-higher-education-act-strengthening-accountability-to-protect-students-and-taxpayers
U.S. Government Accountability Office Testimony
https://www.gao.gov/assets/700/698170.pdf